Define the equivalence story
Align the proposed device, predicate, indications, technological characteristics, and evidence expectations.
Book a Scoping Call FDA 510(k) Submissions
Medical device 510(k) writing support for eSTAR content, substantial equivalence narratives, device descriptions, clinical evidence, and submission review.
The IMTS perspective
A 510(k) submission must give FDA a clear basis for determining substantial equivalence. IMTS helps medical device teams develop consistent, reviewer focused content across eSTAR sections, supporting evidence, testing summaries, device descriptions, and labeling.
The submission needs to explain not only what was tested, but why the chosen predicate, technological comparison, performance data, and clinical evidence support the proposed indications and substantial equivalence conclusion.
Scope of support
How we work
Align the proposed device, predicate, indications, technological characteristics, and evidence expectations.
Write concise submission sections that connect testing and evidence to each identified comparison or question.
Cross check consistency, resolve internal comments, and support focused responses to additional information requests.
Start a conversation
We will help define the scope, source materials, review process, and practical next step.
Book a Scoping Call